| Next to the
United States, the Philippines is the second largest producer of geothermal
power in the world. Historically, among the country's indigenous resources,
it is the largest supplier of electricity and as contained in PEP
2003-2012, it will continue to be a significant source of energy for
the country (Figure 5). Based on 2001 data, geothermal generation
accounted for 22.2 percent of the power mix. Apart from providing
a substantial amount of electricity, geothermal resources, at the
same time, help the country save huge amounts of foreign exchange
through the displacement of a large fraction of imported fuels. For
the next ten years, geothermal energy is projected to displace an
average of 25 MMBFOE of imported fuel yearly, equivalent to foreign
exchange savings of about US$588.4 million (based on an average crude
price of US$25 per barrel).
To date, the country's total estimated potential of untapped geothermal
resource is about 2,600 MW. For the succeeding ten years, plans
to develop proven reserve areas will make possible the availability
of a maximum capacity of 1,200 MW of this estimated potential. Of
these potentials, about 610 MW are situated within service contract
areas belonging to the government-owned Philippine National Oil
Corporation-Energy Development Corporation (PNOC-EDC)(Table 4).
To meet the estimated demand requirements, an average of 36 wells
per year needs to be drilled, 25 of which are intended to be developed
by PNOC-EDC while 11 wells are earmarked for private sector financing.
This contributes a modest average annual increase of 0.8 percent in
geothermal electricity production from 14.1 TWh in 2003 to 15.1 TWh
in 2012. Accordingly, fuel oil displacement is foreseen to rise from
23.5 MMBFOE in 2003 to 25.2 MMBFOE in 2012, corresponding to a total
of US$6.2 billion in foreign exchange savings for the ten-year planning
horizon.
There are two committed plants in the geothermal power plant line-up,
namely: PNOC-EDC's 80-MW Northern Negros plant in Negros Occidental
due for commissioning in 2005 and the Palinpinon 40-MW optimization
project in 2006. Meanwhile, as part of PNOC-EDC's aggressive geothermal
development, drilling of exploratory wells are slated to begin in
2003 for its prospects in Mt. Lobi and Mt. Cabalian, both located
in Southern Leyte, which are expected to confirm steam reserves
(Figure 6).
Incentives
Current incentives for geothermal service contractors are enumerated
under Presidential Decree No. 1442, otherwise known as "An
Act to Promote the Exploration and Development of Geothermal Resources".
These are:
1. Recovery of operating expenses not exceeding 90 percent of the
gross value in any year with carry -forward of unrecovered cost
2. Service fee of up to 40 percent of the net proceeds
3. Exemption from all taxes except income tax
4. Exemption from payment of tariff duties and compensating tax
on the importation of machinery, equipment, spare parts and all
materials for geothermal operations
5. Depreciation of capital equipment over a ten (10) year period
6. Easy repatriation of capital investments and remittance of earnings
7. Entry of alien technical and specialized personnel (including
members of immediate family
Challenges and Gaps
Despite being endowed with numerous active geothermal areas, the
country's substantial potential for geothermal energy remains to
be harnessed notwithstanding government's efforts to promote greater
investments in this sector. As the DOE endeavors to increase the
utilization of geothermal energy, strategies, plans and programs
are being pursued to encourage entry of more investors into the
sector. However, more efforts need to be exerted to spur development
in this sector.
Lack of awareness and interest in investment opportunities
There has been limited private sector investment in steamfield
development. To-date, there are only two geothermal steamfield
developers in the country, namely PNOC-EDC which operates a majority
of the existing geothermal contract areas and Philippine Geothermal
Incorporated (PGI), a subsidiary of the Union Oil of California
(UNOCAL).
Environment and socio-cultural concerns
With the passage of laws for the preservation of the environment
such as Republic Act 7586, or the National Integrated Protected
Areas System (NIPAS) Act, and the empowerment of the cultural
minorities such as Republic Act 8371, otherwise known as "Indigenous
People's Rights Act (IPRA) of 1997, environmental and socio-cultural
concerns are now considered critical factors in geothermal resource
development. There is a need for the harmonization of the NIPAS
and IPRA as these pose problems to RE investors in prospect areas
that are both protected areas and ancestral lands. Moreover, acceptability
of geothermal projects in view of these concerns may prolong the
gestation period of geothermal projects and entail additional
costs.
Technological constraints
The development of some promising geothermal areas has been temporarily
set aside pending technological breakthroughs in handling acidic
wells. An example is Mt. Labo which is located within the boundaries
of Quezon, Camarines Sur, and Camarines Norte. Eight wells have
been drilled in Mt. Labo from 1990 to 1997 but all intersected
acidic geothermal fluids. Similarly, the wellhead assembly at
Alto Peak area of Tongonan Field in Leyte suffered a blowout and
was knocked off due to the fast rate of corrosion from geothermal
fluids. Unless innovative technologies are developed to handle
these natural constraints, harnessing of Mt. Labo and Alto Peak
(with combined resource potential of 80 MW) and other areas with
significant resource potentials may be delayed.
Lack of investment in non-power applications
The country has yet to take off in terms of development of non-power
applications of geothermal energy resources. Mainly resulting
from a lack of financing and public awareness, the development
of spa resorts and crop drying facilities using geothermal heat
is still in the early stages.
While there is a huge potential for geothermal heat in crop drying,
harnessing of this potential is hampered by the preference for
sunlight, which is the traditional source of energy for drying
in the country. People have yet to realize the benefits of using
geothermal heat, especially in terms of time saved in drying owing
to its high temperature and non-seasonality compared to sunlight.
The ideal use of geothermal heat, which will bring about large
savings in fossil energy consumption, will be for industrial purposes.
In this light, bringing geothermal heat to industrial installations
or bringing industries near geothermal fields poses an additional
challenge in order to achieve increased use of the resource in
industries. Examples of such industries include pulp and paper,
veneer factory, timber drying, beer brewery and distillation and
confectionary industry.
PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
The DOE will conduct international and local promotion of investment
opportunities in Philippine geothermal exploration and development
to increase private sector investments and encourage the entry of
modern and innovative technologies. Exploration programs, including
reconnaissance activities and semi-detailed studies of potential
geothermal areas will be sustained to provide sufficient information
to prospective developers and investors. Socio-economic profiling
of at least seven prospects will also be continued to provide a
glimpse of the geothermal utilization demand in the target areas.
Optimal use for non-power applications
To demonstrate the government's efforts to focus on promoting
the non-power application of geothermal resources, proposals for
a multi-crop dryer project in Leyte and for the enhancement of
the self-reliant multi-crop dryer project in Manito, Albay will
be pursued. A showcase project exists in the Palinpinon geothermal
complex in Southern Negros facilitating the operations of a local
cooperative on agricultural products.
In addition, close cooperation with the Department of Tourism
(DOT) and the Philippine Institute of Traditional and Alternative
Health Care (PITAHC) for promoting hot spring areas for possible
spa resort development will likewise be pursued. The project will
revitalize the use of geothermal resources for balneology and
therapeutic purposes. Site assessment of four more areas, namely
Camiguin Island in Cagayan, Mt. Apo in Cotabato, Northern Negros
and Tuba in Benguet will be conducted.
A Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) was forged in May 2002 to delineate
the scope of cooperation. The DOT will lead the implementation
of the project and will prepare an investment promotion package
for spa resort development. On the other hand, DOE will identify
the hot spring areas favorable for spa resort development. The
PITAHC will train the locals on therapeutic massage and the use
of herbs for therapy.
Intensive promotion of geothermal energy
Geothermal energy exploration and development will be a part
of the DOE's aggressive investment promotion campaigns. Public
awareness campaigns will be conducted to boost private sector
investments in geothermal projects, enhance its acceptability
and harmonize the same with environmental and social concerns,
as highlighted by the enactment of NIPAS and IPRA, respectively.
As an initial effort, international cooperation for the Coordinating
Committee on Coastal and Offshore Geoscience Programme (CCOP)
Project on Regional Geothermal Database Compilation shall continue
until 2006. The project aims to produce base maps and a geothermal
database in CD-ROM.
Meanwhile, the DOE recently entered into an agreement with the
DENR to consider geothermal areas for use as airsheds. Under Memorandum
Circular (MC) No. 2002-13 issued by the DENR, geothermal airsheds
shall be provided for geothermal areas with existing projects
and those listed in the PEP and other areas designated by DOE
as well as areas that may be affected by the dispersion of air
pollutants from geothermal operations. The guidelines embodied
in the MC are expected to facilitate the compliance of the geothermal
power sector with the Clean Air Act (R.A. 8749).
|